Legal Opinion

Collins v. . Vandiford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeicson, J.

This is a civil action to recover $100, alleged to be due on a note (conditional sale agreement) made by defendant to plaintiff on purchase of a Ford truck. Defendant denied liability and alleged: “That after the said conditional sale agreement and buyer’s statement had been executed and delivered to the plaintiff, the purchase price of $350 was wrongfully, falsely and fraudulently changed and altered to $450, with intent to defraud the defendant to the amount of $100 in excess of the purchase price which he agreed to pay.”

After stating the contentions clearly and fairly, the court below…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Swan v. . CarawanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Guano Co. v. . MarksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Raleigh Banking & Trust Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bowden v. BowdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. AUTO FINANCE COMPANY OF NC v. McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Furst v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. White v. LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Davis v. . DockerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API