Legal Opinion

Smith Builders Supply, Inc. v. Dixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1957No. 170PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Plaintiff was engaged in the business of selling building supplies, including lumber.

As to the first cause of action, defendant’s admission established that $253.44 was the correct charge. Wells v. Clayton, 236 N.C. 102, 72 S.E. 2d 16. Therefore, the burden was upon defendant to prove his affirmative defense of payment. White v. Logan, 240 N.C. 791, 83 S.E. 2d 892. He offered no evidence of payment, but relied solely upon his alleged counterclaim as justification for his failure to pay.

As to the separate account for advancements, plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that plaintiff made…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. McLaurin v. . CronlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. State v. FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. AUTO FINANCE COMPANY OF NC v. McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Piedmont Plastics, Inc. v. Mize Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API