Joyce v. Sell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevikt, J.
The allowance of defendant’s motion for judgment of involuntary nonsuit requires consideration of plaintiffs’ evidence in the light most.favorable for them. Ervin v. Mills Co., ante, 415.
Plaintiffs’ evidence tended to show that desiring to close their mercantile business in Mt. Airy, North Carolina, they contracted to sell and the defendant contracted to purchase their entire stock of hardware, and automotive and electrical appliances at one-half the manufacturer’s cost price, amounting to $3,151.70. This was 16 June, 1948. The goods were promptly delivered to the defendant at his place of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Hampton v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- North Carolina Department of Justice v. EakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Thompson v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Nationwide Homes of Raleigh, N. C., Inc. v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- White v. LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.