Legal Opinion

Furst v. . Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

“We think it only necessary to consider one exception and assignment of error.

The defendant, J. E. Taylor, on 2/9/ 1929, wrote plaintiff's: “Dear Sir: I have checked over my account with your statement showing that I owe you a balance of $884.66 on 1 January, 1929. I approve this as being correct.”

On 29 August, 1929, he also wrote plaintiffs: “Just received your letter in regard to what I owe you. Will say I have not the money to pay it now, but if you will be so kind as to give me time, I think I can collect enough to pay up all right. I have got out on my books over $2,000. I will get out…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashford v. H. C. Shrader Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Durham Construction Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Collins v. . VandifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. McCall v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Douglas v. W. C. Mallison & SonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Southern Box and Lumber Co. v. Home Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. White v. LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Davis v. . DockerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Bright v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API