Legal Opinion

Davis v. . Dockery

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether thei’e was error in the judge’s charge as to the burden of proof on the second issue.

The plaintiff having brought his action to recover a certain amount alleged to be due as the balance of the purchase price of land, the defendant answered admitting the agreement to purchase, and the amount agreed to be paid, and pleaded payment in full as a defense.

There was no controversy as to the agreement, nor as to the amount agreed to be paid, and the court properly instructed the jury to answer the first issue in the affirmative.

While the second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Stein v. . LevinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Vaughan v. . LewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Furst v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Swan v. . CarawanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. AUTO FINANCE COMPANY OF NC v. McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. White v. LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Bright v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. White v. McCarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Meriden National Bank v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API