Legal Opinion

Dittbrenner v. Myerson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 28, 1946No. 15,448PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Ellen Dittbrenner brought action below against Louie Myerson and others, charging fraud in connectiq>n with the sale of real estate. The trial court denied relief and plaintiff urges reversal upon the ground that the court misconstrued the issues of fact and law and that the evidence conclusively discloses actionable fraud. In this situation it becomes necessary that we examine the evidence and ascertain if the trial court properly conceived the law of the case and, if not, whether its decree is supported by the evidence under a proper conception of the law. Davis v. Pursel, 55 Colo. 287, 134…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Davis v. PurselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. Sears v. HicklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  4. Fort Collins Development Railway Co. v. FranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  5. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. HeckmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Trussell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1964
  2. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. The Great Western Sugar CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  4. Zimmerman v. LooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Hanks v. McNeil Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API