Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Company
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
• Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
WINNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s amended complaint pleads two counts. The theory of Count Two is that the sugarbeet growers’ contracts which are the subject of this litigation are securities, and that the Court has jurisdiction of Count Two under 15 U.S.C. § 78aa. On January 16, 1975, applying as the law of this Circuit Mr. Steak, Inc. v. River City Steak, Inc., D. C., 324 F.Supp. 640, aff’d 10 Cir., 460 F.2d 666, I held that the growers’ contracts are not securities, and Count Two was dismissed. This effectively dismissed Great…
2Cases cited148 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Mesa Sand & Gravel Co. v. Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Trans-Global Alloy v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.