Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Heckman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1909No. 5586PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Chaff ee'District Court—Hon. Morton S. Bailey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Musser

The appellee, who. was plaintiff below, brought this action for damages, claimed to have been- sustained by him on account of changes made by defendant in a ditch , owned by the plaintiff. The defendant reconstructed a portion of its railroad in Chaffee county, and, in doing so, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant crossed the ditch at three different points, and changed the location, grade and *471course of the ditch in various places. The plaintiff further alleged, that these changes retarded the flow of, and diminished the water in, the ditch, caused it to fill with gravel and sediment…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Tunnel Mining and Leasing Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Dittbrenner v. MyersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  4. Stone v. Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  5. Denver Tramway Corp. v. GentrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API