Legal Opinion
Trussell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 21, 1964No. Civ. A. 8170PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this case are numerous individual purchasers of the stock of United Underwriters, Ltd. The separate defendants are United Underwriters, Ltd. and several individuals who, allege-the plaintiffs, are associated with and. control United Underwriters, Ltd. In their complaint the plaintiffs have stated five separate claims for relief which we-will examine in turn.
THE CLAIMS
First:
The first claim is said to arise under- § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act. of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated pursuant thereto. As will later be seen this, claim is insufficient…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,975 Michelle K. Tomera, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Arthur T. Galt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,947 Dean Walling v. Beverly Enterprises, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.