Legal Opinion

Sears v. Hicklin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1889PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Pueblo County.

1Opinion of the Court

Reed, C.

A suit in equity. Complaint filed by the appellee, Estefana Hicklin, plaintiff below, against the appellant, George Sears, defendant, to cancel and set aside a conveyance of some one thousand two hundred acres of land in the county of Pueblo, conveyed by plaintiff to the defendant on the 8th day of September, 1882; the said one thousand two hundred acres of land being a part of a larger tract containing five thousand one hundred and eighteen and seventy-two one-hundredths acres, •awarded, confirmed and patented to plaintiff by the government of the United States under an act approved…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boyce's Executors v. GrundySupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Piatt v. VattierSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  3. Seth v. CramerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
  4. M'Cormick v. MalinIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  5. McFerran v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  3. Meldrum v. MeldrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. Dittbrenner v. MyersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  5. Barnes v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API