In re the Claim of Jimenez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 13, 2005, which ruled that claimant was *942disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was fired from her employment as a machine operator after she failed to return to work at the end of an authorized bereavement leave and did not notify the employer that her return would be delayed. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of CranstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of RaykinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of OakfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of ConescuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006