Bailey v. Evans
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
Only two propositions are presented and argued by plaintiffs in their brief so that all other specifications of error will be considered as abandoned. The first proposition raised goes to the question of the materiality of the alteration in the bond sued upon, while the second proposition is- directed to a certain arbitration which is alleged to have taken place before King finally abandoned the contract and left the country. Under the view taken of the case here the second proposition urged by plaintiffs becomes wholly immaterial if the finding of the trial court under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. FellnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Semple v. BakenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Cox v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Francen v. Oklahoma Star Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Gilkeson v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boys v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- American National Bank of Wetumka v. HightowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Terrell v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Adkins v. Investors SyndicateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Griffin Grocery Co. v. Carson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935