Legal Opinion

De Vitt v. City of El Reno

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1910No. 1846PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from District Court, Canadian County; A. II. Huston, Special Judge. Action by P. J. De Yitt and others against the City of El Reno and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was a suit commenced by the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, as owners of various lots situated in a paving district in the city of El Reno, against the defendants in error, defendants below, for the purpose of declaring all the proceedings and acts of the city council of said city in relation to paving said district null and void, and to relieve the real estate of said plaintiffs from the apparent liens that said proceedings created thereon, and to enjoin said city from taking any further action or proceedings under and by virtue of a.certain paving contract between said c-ity and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Allison v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Menten v. ShutteeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  3. Hunter Realty Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Boyd v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  5. In re the Estate of DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Collins v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Connelly v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Kerr v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Hodges v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Mooney v. First State Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API