Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Fellner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1900PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error from the District Court of Nolle County; before Bayard T. Earner, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Buej?ord, G. J.:

The defendant in error, Lena Fellner, brought an action in the district court of Noble county against the plaintiffs in error, S. E. Richardson and F. A. Richardson, to recover judgment on a mote for the sum of $500, executed by the Richardsons to Samuel Fellner, and by him assigned to Lena Fellner, as collateral- security for another debt, and to (have declared and enforced a vendor’s lien for the amount of said note against certain ical estate described in the note. S-. E. Richardson and F. A. Richardson denied1 the execution of the note under oath.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Moore v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Johnston v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Low v. ArgroveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Frick-Reid Supply Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Moore v. Leigh-Head & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API