Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1922No. 23,164PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is an action for personal injuries in which plaintiff had a verdict and defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Plaintiff was a pipe fitter in defendant’s shops at Austin, Minnesota, and at the time of the accident was engaged in repairing the air hose on a locomotive employed in interstate commerce. A Still-son or pipe wrench which he was using slipped, causing him to fall in such a manner that he sustained an injury to the lower part of, his spine. The teeth of the wrench had become worn and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Webster Manufacturing Co. v. NisbettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Anderson v. FieldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Koschman v. AshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Mozey v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Mollock v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API