Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1924No. 5,521PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

The plaintiff, an employee of the defendant railway company, was injured while in the discharge of his duties as section-hand, and brought this action to recover damages. He contends that he was required to work with a pick, the points of which had become- so worn and dull that the use of it greatly increased the hazards of his employment; that about September 1, 1922, he complained to the foreman in charge, who promised to have it sharpened or to supply a sharpened pick; that he relied upon the promise and continued to use the defective tool; that on September 24, while engaged in an ef*394fort…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Eureka Co. v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Greene v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Ball v. GussenhovenMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Webster Manufacturing Co. v. NisbettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Pickett v. KygerMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Collins v. ItohMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Parini v. LanchMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Allers v. WillisMontana Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API