Koschman v. Ash
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $10,380 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Dibell, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,650. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The plaintiff, Kos.chman, was injured while in the employ of the defendant, Ash, and recovered a verdict in the court below. The appeal is from an order of the trial court denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
In 1903 Ash was operating a sawmill in Virginia, Minnesota. *313Koschman was, and for some months had been, in his employ as a blacksmith, working in a shop operated in connection with the mill. At the time of the accident, July 17, 1903, Koschman was engaged with another employee by the name of Olson in cutting bolts from a rod of iron.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Cahill v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Martin v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Webster Manufacturing Co. v. NisbettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Williams v. Garbutt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Meyer v. LadewigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Frye v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Ohio Valley Railway Co. v. CopleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. MayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.