Mollock v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a section laborer. It furnished him a shovel having a handle which was rough, checked, cracked and had slivers. The condition of the handle caused his hand to become scratched and blistered. It became a serious injury by reason of infection. The suit was brought for damages suffered by reason of the alleged failure of defendant to furnish a safe, simple tool to be used in the work. Plaintiff was given a verdict for $1,250. Defendant has appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial.
Do the facts support the claim of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Webster Manufacturing Co. v. NisbettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Meador v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Fischer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Baumwald v. TrenkmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hedicke v. Highland Springs Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Mozey v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Jackson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Thompson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Dally v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.