Legal Opinion

Mollock v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1925No. 24,380PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a section laborer. It furnished him a shovel having a handle which was rough, checked, cracked and had slivers. The condition of the handle caused his hand to become scratched and blistered. It became a serious injury by reason of infection. The suit was brought for damages suffered by reason of the alleged failure of defendant to furnish a safe, simple tool to be used in the work. Plaintiff was given a verdict for $1,250. Defendant has appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial.

Do the facts support the claim of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Webster Manufacturing Co. v. NisbettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Meador v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Fischer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Baumwald v. TrenkmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hedicke v. Highland Springs Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Mozey v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Jackson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Thompson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Dally v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API