Legal Opinion

Mozey v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1931No. 28,110PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff appealed from an order granting defendant judgment non obstante pursuant to the usual alternative motion.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant to do cleaning work in a house into which he was about to move. On Monday, and Tuesday she used a stepladder on which was a little platform to hold a pail of water and from which ladder she cleaned walls. Wednesday morning when she came • to work the stepladder had been taken away and another one without such platform was furnished for her use. She took the stepladder from where it was leaning against a wall, moved it to where she wished to use…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koschman v. AshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Dessecker v. Phœnix Mills Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Anderson v. Fred Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Sivley v. Nixon Mining Drill Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Sheridan v. Gorham Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heise v. the JR Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Olson v. Kem Temple, Ancient Arabic OrderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hedicke v. Highland Springs Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Person v. OkesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Cayse v. Foley Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API