Legal Opinion
Bednarz v. Eye Physicians of Central Connecticut, P.C.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 3, 2008No. SC 17934PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KA.TZ, J.
The plaintiff, Karen Bednarz, appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant Peter G. Burch 1 in her medical malpractice action. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that her action against the defendant was time barred because there were insufficient facts in dispute to toll the period of repose under General Statutes § 52-584. 2 Specifically, the plaintiff contends that there were disputed facts sufficient to warrant invocation of either the continuing course of conduct doctrine, the continuous course of treatment doctrine or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Blanchette v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Neuhaus v. DeCholnokySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Grey v. Stamford Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Martinelli v. FusiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Himmelstein v. Town of WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- James v. Valley-Shore Y.M.C.A., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- McCullough v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Tuccio Development, Inc. v. NeumannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.