Legal Opinion

People v. Bynes

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1963No. Crim. 4338PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.

Defendants Yelcie Bynes, John Henry Lambert, Sam Rose and Nathaniel Ballard, Jr., were jointly charged by indictment with the robbery of C. S. Jasiewicz, the robbery and kidnaping for the purpose of robbery of Doris Craig, and five separate counts of the forcible rape of Doris Craig. After a trial by jury, defendant Bynes was found guilty of the robbery of Jaskiewicz; the kidnaping of Craig in violation of Penal Code, section 207, a lesser offense included within the charge of kidnaping for the purpose of robbery; the robbery of Craig; and five counts of forcible rape. Defendants Lambert and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. MummertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. FaillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. FortnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. WhiteheadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API