Legal Opinion

People v. Mummert

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1943No. Crim. 3666PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appellants were jointly and severally accused by amended information in four counts of rape on the same woman, on the same night. Each count charges a separate crime by the four men in that as each raped the prosecutrix the other three aided and abetted him; that each defendant accomplished his act without the consent of the young lady; that she resisted, but that her resistance was overcome by force and violence used upon her by defendants. Defendant Wayman Mummert is alleged to have suffered a previous conviction of possessing an illicit still. Since no point is made of that bit of personal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. People v. VillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. State v. FortnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. WhiteheadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API