Legal Opinion

People v. Failla

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1966No. Crim. 9734PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon jury verdicts, of five counts of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and one count of simple kidnaping (Pen. Code, § 207).

The facts of the alleged offenses need not be related in great detail. Counts I through V charged defendant with five burglaries arising out of nighttime entries into the apartments of five different female victims “with the intent ... to commit a felony and theft”; Count VI, kidnaping, was predicated on an incident occurring in the course of the burglary charged in Count II. In summary, the evidence showed the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. PrettymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. The People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. RussoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API