Stiles v. Cain
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
—This is an action for specific performance. The plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appealed therefrom within sixty days after its rendition, and the evidence was preserved in a bill of exceptions. The parties were husband and wife when the contract involved in the case was entered into, but have since been divorced, and the plaintiff has assumed her maiden name. A general demurrer for want of facts was interposed to the complaint, which was overruled.
The complaint shows that the parties entered into an agreement, which is set out at length, and that plaintiff has fully performed on her…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bruck v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Dimond v. SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Beals ex rel. Walker v. AresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- Wilcox v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- In Re Estate of WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.