Breswick & Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Per curiam
This is an action to enjoin, or vacate and set aside as void, orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Since the filing of our previous opinion dealing with the preliminary injunction, 1 and of our order granting such an injunction, we have held a hearing on the merits, at which we received evidence, heard extensive arguments, and received elaborate briefs, concerning final relief. 1a As a result, we adhere, for the most part, to what was said in the previous majority opinion.
1. However, we now think the following considerations are pivotal: Defendants’ chief contention runs thus: (1)…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Alleghany Corp. v. Breswick & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hoover v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- J. John Brouk, James J. Mullen, Jr., W. Munro Roberts, Jr. v. Managed Funds, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Murchison v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.