Legal Opinion
Hoover v. Allen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 22, 1965PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Defendants Keith, Moerman, Sharp, Ludwig and the American-Hawaiian Steamship Company (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Company), a New Jersey corporation, have moved, pursuant to Rules 56 and 43(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment.
This is an action brought by stockholders of the Company both derivatively, in the right of the Company, and representatively, in behalf of themselves and other stockholders similarly situated.
The voluminous Final Amended Supplemental Complaint (hereinafter referred to as the Complaint) was originally…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- The Greater Iowa Corporation v. Frank McLendonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Mutual Shares Corporation, Spingarn Heine & Co., and Norte & Co. v. Genesco, Inc., and W. Maxey JarmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.