Legal Opinion
Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 17, 1939No. 481PublishedCited by 625 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
This is an appeal, under § 238 of the Judicial Code as ■amended (28 U. S. C. § 345), from a final decree by a district court of three judges, under the Urgent Deficiencies Act of October 22, 1913 (28 U. S. C. §§ 45, 47a) as extended by § 402 (a) of the Federal Communications Act (47 U. S. C. § 402 (a)), dismissing on the merits a bill to review an order of the Federal Communications Commission/
At the outset a challenge to the jurisdiction of the District Court confronts us. It involves those problems of administrative law which are implied by the doctrine of “negative orders.” Inasmuch as…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by625 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
620 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.