Legal Opinion

Estate of Sanford v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1939No. 34PublishedCited by 546 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This and its companion case, Rasquin v. Humphreys, post, p. 54, present the single question of statutory construction whether in the case of an inter vivos transfer of property in trust, by a donor reserving to himself the power to designate new beneficiaries other than himself, the gift becomes complete and subject to the gift tax imposed by the federal revenue laws at the time of the relinquishment of the power. Corelative questions, important only if a negative answer is given to the first one, are whether the gift becomes complete and taxable when the trust is created or, in the case…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Morrissey v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by546 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Lincoln v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Erlenbaugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

541 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API