Legal Opinion

Murchison v. Kirby

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 30, 1961PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Alleghany Corporation has been the storm center of a series of derivative actions brought by stockholders pur*15portedly for its benefit. This latest action to redress alleged wrongs inflicted upon the Corporation finds the role of the litigants somewhat reversed in that co-plaintiffs herein, the Murchison brothers, were themselves defendants with others in the prior litigations which are the subject of this action. The plaintiffs here seek, in substance, to set aside as fraudulent a settlement of earlier derivative actions in this and state courts entered into by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Alleghany Corp. v. Breswick & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Lau Ah Yew v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel v. AronoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Child v. BeameDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Hubbard v. Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1977
  4. Edinburgh Assurance Company, and Cross-Appellees v. R. L. Burns Corp. And American Pacific International, Inc., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Maryland Ex Rel. Sachs v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API