Legal Opinion

State v. Alverson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1988No. 8817SC199PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant first contends the trial court erred by expressing its opinion as to his guilt in front of the jury. He bases this argument on 39 exceptions noted in the record. During the trial, the trial judge on numerous occasions sustained objections by the State that defendant’s counsel was leading witnesses on direct examination. He admonished defendant’s counsel by making comments such as “I can’t let you testify for your own witness,” and “[y]ou may ask when it was, that is an easy question, when, where, why and what.” Defendant argues the trial judge did not admonish…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. SaltersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. UprightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API