Legal Opinion

State v. Upright

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 28, 1984No. 8419SC205PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

A. Defendant Upright’s Appeal

In his first three assignments of error, defendant Upright contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions for dismissal and judgment notwithstanding the verdict because the evidence was insufficient to find that he committed the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant Upright argues that the evidence was wholly circumstantial and that the State’s principal witness admitted that he did not see him shoot Brooks. It is defendant Upright’s position that for these reasons the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to go to the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. LloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. AlversonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API