Legal Opinion

State v. Harrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 18, 2005No. COA03-1620Published

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRIA, Judge.

Defendant Allen George Harrell, Jr. ("defendant") was charged with second-degree rape of B.E.1 Prior to trial, the trial court held an in-camera review in order to determine whether evidence of B.E.'s sexual relationship with Bret Livengood ("Livengood") was admissible in light of North Carolina Rules of Evidence, Rule 412. At the close of the evidence, the trial court determined that any evidence of B.E.'s sexual relationship with Livengood was irrelevant but that evidence of a dating relationship between them was admissible. On the evening of 16 February 2002 B.E. met her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. YoungerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. GinyardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. AlversonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API