Legal Opinion

State v. Salters

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1983No. 8214SC1364PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant contends that it was error for the court to deny his motion to dismiss as to the charge of felonious breaking or entering. Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support a charge of felonious breaking or entering. Specifically, defendant asserts that the circumstantial evidence presented by the State fails to establish sufficiently the larcenous intent necessary to support the charge.

In a motion to dismiss, the question presented is whether the evidence is legally sufficient to support a verdict of guilty on the offense charged, thereby warranting…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BallardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. BarrancoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. BushCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. UprightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. BushCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API