Legal Opinion

State v. Gaston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1952No. 506PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EeviN, I.

Under the rules regulating practice and procedure in criminal actions, the objection that the evidence is not sufficient to carry the case to the jury or to sustain a verdict against the accused must be raised during the trial by a motion for a compulsory nonsuit under the statute now embodied in G.S. 15-173, or by a prayer for instruction to the jury. S. v. Brady, 177 N.C. 587, 99 S.E. 7; S. v. Holder, 133 N.C. 709, 45 S.E. 862; S. v. Staton, 133 N.C. 642, 45 S.E. 362; S. v. Secrest, 80 N.C. 450. It cannot be raised for the first time after verdict. S. v. Jackson, 190 N.C. 862, 129…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. State v. . LeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. State v. . KigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. LindleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API