State v. Lindley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Defendant contends the court erred in allowing Officer R. L. Thompson, a lay witness, to testify that after observing defendant at the time of his arrest and on the way to jail he formed an opinion satisfactory to himself that defendant was under the influence of some drug. Admission of such testimony over objection constitutes defendant’s first assignment of error.
Opinion evidence is generally inadmissible “whenever the witness can relate the facts so that the jury will have an adequate understanding of them and the jury is as well qualified as the witness to draw inferences…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Nimmo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. McKenzieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.