Legal Opinion

State v. Gaines

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1973No. 15PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant contends the court erred in permitting the prosecuting witness to identify him as her assailant on the ground that her in-court identification was based upon a pretrial lineup so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to mistaken identification as to be a denial of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

The constitutional principles relied on by defendant are well established. Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 18 L.Ed. 2d 1199, 87 S.Ct. 1967 (1967), states that the “totality of circumstances” may show the use of lineup procedures “so unnecessarily suggestive and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. TatumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API