Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. Haid

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 7, 1931PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original proceeding in mandamus, commenced in this court on February 1, 1930, wherein we granted our alternative writ, after due consideration of the relators' petition or application therefor. The proceeding has been twice argued to this court, sitting en banc. Upon the final hearing and submission of the proceeding, the Court en Banc ordered the writer of this opinion, as a commissioner of the court, to sit with the Court en Banc, and the cause was assigned to the writer for the preparation of an opinion.

The relators seek the award and issuance of our peremptory writ of mandamus…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Bateson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  3. Kelley v. RhoadsWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State Ex Rel. Brewen-Clark Syrup Co. v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. Conant v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Davis v. Research Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Barker v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API