Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 2006No. 1704, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. EYLER, Judge.

We are asked to determine the meaning of “zoning action,” as used in Maryland Code (1957, 2003 Repl.Vol.), Article 66B, § 2.09(a)(1), which provides for judicial review of “zoning action” by the City Council of Baltimore. We will use this as an opportunity to clarify our prior decision, interpreting the same language, in MBC Realty v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 160 Md.App. 376, 864 A.2d 218 (2004).

Douglas M. Armstrong, an appellant, and several other owners of residential properties in Baltimore City, 1 filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City a petition…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Fallin v. Knox County Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Maryland Overpak Corporation v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Talbot County v. Miles Point Property, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Anderson House, LLC v. Mayor of RockvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Armstrong v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Appleton Regional Community Alliance v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API