Sliman v. Aluminum Co. of America
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
Plaintiff Carolyn Sliman suffered complete loss of sight in her left eye as a result of an aluminum twist-off cap having forcibly ejected from a 7-Up soft drink bottle. Plaintiffs sued the defendant-appellant Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA), Seven-Up U.S.A. Inc., Noel Canning (Seven-Up U.S.A.’s bottler), and various other defendants. After trial a jury found plaintiff Carolyn Sliman 25 percent at fault, defendant Seven-Up U.S.A. 45 percent at fault, ALCOA 30 percent at fault, and apportioned no fault to the rest of the defendants. The jury found the plaintiffs’ damages…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Garnett v. Transamerica Insurance ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- Walston v. Monumental Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.