Legal Opinion

Sliman v. Aluminum Co. of America

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1986No. 15883PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Plaintiff Carolyn Sliman suffered complete loss of sight in her left eye as a result of an aluminum twist-off cap having forcibly ejected from a 7-Up soft drink bottle. Plaintiffs sued the defendant-appellant Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA), Seven-Up U.S.A. Inc., Noel Canning (Seven-Up U.S.A.’s bottler), and various other defendants. After trial a jury found plaintiff Carolyn Sliman 25 percent at fault, defendant Seven-Up U.S.A. 45 percent at fault, ALCOA 30 percent at fault, and apportioned no fault to the rest of the defendants. The jury found the plaintiffs’ damages…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Garnett v. Transamerica Insurance ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  5. Walston v. Monumental Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API