Legal Opinion

Toner v. Lederle Laboratories

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1987No. 16453PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*330BISTLINE, Justice.

In 1979, plaintiff child Kevin Toner, then three months old, received a vaccination of Tri-Immunol, a drug manufactured by defendant Lederle Laboratories and designed to immunize children against diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus. Thereafter, Kevin suffered a rare condition of the spine known as transverse myelitis. The affliction permanently paralyzed Kevin from the waist down. Plaintiffs brought suit against Lederle in Idaho state court, but the suit was removed to federal district court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. At trial, the jury found that Lederle’s…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. Carroll Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. West v. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API