Legal Opinion

Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1980No. 50745PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The parents of a minor child brought this action to recover damages for injuries suffered by the child during the fetal stage, the injuries having allegedly been caused by a drug, administered to the mother during delivery of the child. In the first three counts, Parke Davis & Co., the manufacturer of the drug in question, was named as defendant. Counts I and II, sounding in strict liability in tort, sought, respectively, recovery on behalf of the child for his injuries and recovery for plaintiffs’ mental anguish and distress. Count III sought the same recovery as count I, but was based on…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Genaust v. Illinois Power Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Berry v. G. D. Searle & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API