Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Bethlehem), Energy Pipeline Corporation (Pipeline), Energy Production Company (Production), Union Drilling, Inc., New Jersey Natural Resources Company and Bessie 8 (Petitioners, collectively) appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) reversing the decision of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) James D. Porterfield and ordering Petitioners to file an application for a certificate of public convenience. The single issue for our disposition is whether the PUC erred in holding that Petitioners were subject to its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Borough of Ambridge, Appel. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Aronimink Transportation Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Waltman v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Borough of Olyphant v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Energy Pipeline, Inc. v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API