Legal Opinion

Aronimink Transportation Co. v. P. S. C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1933No. Appeal 210PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

The Aronimink Transportation Company, a certified common carrier, filed a complaint against the respondent on the ground that it was operating as a common carrier of passengers by a motor vehicle without a certificate of public convenience from the Public Service Commission. A hearing was had and the petition was dismissed by the Commission for the reason that the bus service rendered by the respondent is not a public engagement but is private in character; that respondent is not a public service company and that the Commission had no ¡jurisdiction, from which order an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borough of Ambridge, Appel. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Harder v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Keystone Warehousing Co. v. Pub. Serv. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Frantz v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Lazor v. BanasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Peter Daniels Realty, Inc. v. Northern Equity Investors, Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API