Legal Opinion
Borough of Ambridge, Appel. v. P.S.C.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 17, 1932No. Appeal 130PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtfeld, J.,
This is an appeal by the Borough of Ambridge from the order of the Public Service Commission dismissing its complaint against A. M. Byers Company which is charged with operating as a public service company without having obtained a certificate of public convenience from the Public Service Commission.
The complaint alleged that the Borough of Am-bridge had for a number of years been supplying water to the public for domestic and manufacturing purposes, and in 1918 had extended its water lines beyond its corporate limits into Harmony Township, adjacent thereto, and since…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- White v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Overlook Development Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Citizens Electric Illuminating Co. v. Lackawanna & Wyoming Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Overlook Development Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Inland Empire Rural Electrification, Inc. v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Rural Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Brink's Express Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Felix v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.