Legal Opinion

Borough of Olyphant v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN.

Before the Court is the Borough of Oly-phant’s (Borough) appeal of a declaratory order issued by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC). PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (PPL) had filed a Petition for Declaratory Order with the PUC, seeking to terminate controversies concerning (1) the Borough’s attempt to force PPL to abandon its certificated electric service within the Mid-Valley Industrial Park (MVIP), and (2) the obligation of PPL retail customers within the certificated territory to pay competitive and intangible transition charges. The PUC issued a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A. Funk O. Harrison, a minor, by his guardian A. Lee v. Tom Wolf, in his official capacity as Governor of Pennsylvania PA DEPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Spectrum Arena Ltd. Partnership v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Borough of Lansdale v. PP & L, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Spectrum Arena Ltd. Partnership v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Spectrum Arena Ltd. Partnership v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API