Legal Opinion
Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1965No. Appeals, Nos. 27, 28 and 29PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
Applications to the Public Utility Commission were filed by the Philadelphia Electric Company and the Philadelphia Suburban Water Company seeking approval of the transfer by sale of certain equipment.1 Commission approval would enable the applicants to transfer distribution, service-supply and metering equipment to Drexelbrook Associates, a registered limited partnership which owns and manages a real estate development known as “Drexelbrook”. Drexelbrook, located in Drexel Hill, Delaware County, is a garden-type apartment village with 90 buildings, containing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Borough of Ambridge, Appel. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Overlook Development Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Klawansky v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Overlook Development Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Dahlin v. Amoco Oil Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cottonwood Mall Shopping Center, Inc. v. Utah Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Western Pennsylvania Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- City of Sun Prairie v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Public Service Commission v. Howard Research & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.