Energy Pipeline, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission

COLINS, President Judge.

Before the Court is the appeal of Energy Pipeline, Inc. and Energy Production Company (collectively, Energy Pipeline) to the decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC). The PUC denied Energy Pipeline’s Application for Attorney’s Fees and Costs pursuant to the Administrative Agency Actions Act (Costs Act). 1 Wo affirm.

The relevant facts are as follows. 2 On January 26, 1984, Energy Pipeline entered into an agreement to supply natural gas to Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Bethlehem). Pursuant to this agreement, Energy Pipeline was to construct a 21-mile…