Legal Opinion
Parizo v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 6, 1929PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.
This is an action in tort to recover for injuries to person and property arising from an automobile collision. The accident took place in Canada, a short distance north of the border. The plaintiff was driving south, and the defendant’s car was proceeding in the opposite direction. After a trial by jury, the verdict was for the plaintiff as against the defendant Wilson, with damages of $500. The defendant Ferrari was found not liable. It appeared that Ferrari owned the car, and that Wilson was driving it. Whether Ferrari was present was a controverted question, but certain evidence tended to…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Norfolk Southern Railroad v. FerebeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Chrysler Corp. v. QuimbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- Turner v. Roman Catholic DioceseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.