Waterman v. Moody
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal in Chancery. Heard on issues presented by the pleadings, facts found by the chancellor and defendant’s exceptions thereto, in vacation after the June Term, 1916,' Windsor County, Fish, Chancellor. Decree for plaintiff. Defendants appealed. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The plaintiff and the defendant Abbie E. Moody occupy adjoining farms in Royalton. The defendant Henry H. Rogers resides with and assists the said Abbie E. in managing her farm. The plaintiff’s farm is sometimes referred to as the Lyman farm and defendants’ as the Fay farm. A wood lot connected with defendants’ farm is so situated that it can be reached most conveniently by crossing plaintiff’s meadow land.
In his original bill the plaintiff seeks to have the defendants enjoined from crossing his land in going to and from said wood lot. By a joint and several answer and cross bill the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Fletcher v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Holtzman v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Joyce v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Wade v. PulsiferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Tracy v. AthertonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1863
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jarvis v. GillespieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Raithel Et Ux. v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Russell v. PareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Hall v. Windsor Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Taylor v. Henderson and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.