Legal Opinion

Amey v. Hall

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1962No. 487PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

The main controversy in this action of trespass is the location of the boundary dividing adjoining timber lands contained in one of the original lots in the town of Guildhall. The parcel in question is designated as Lot 14 in Range 1. The plaintiff has a deed to the southeast half of Lot 14, referred to as the south lot. The defendant holds title to the northwest half.comprising the remaining area to the north of the plaintiff’s holding.’ No courses, metes nor bounds are given for Lot 14 or any of its subdivisions.

The boundary claimed by the plaintiff was identified by old blaze lines and old…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  2. Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. Nelson v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  5. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  2. N.A.S. Holdings, Inc. v. PafundiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Pion v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. Jarvis v. GillespieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. Laird Properties New England Land Syndicate v. Mad River Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API